Galiger v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Knous
In the county court plaintiff in error, a cousin of Ethel M. Hall, deceased, sought to have voided the residuary clause of the latter’s will, to the end that the residue of the estate might devolve to plaintiff in error and other heirs at law as intestate property. The adjudication below was adverse to the attack, and plaintiff in error here seeks a reversal on a review of the proceeding.
The paragraph of the will in controversy reads as follows: “Fourth: All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real, personal, and mixed of whatever kind or nature and wheresoever, situate, including…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Clayton v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Robbins v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. BanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Jeffreys v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kopff v. JuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- State v. Estate of FischSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Walter v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Smith v. United States National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- City & County of Denver v. Park Hill Golf ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.