Legal Opinion

Santos v. Kim

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1999PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiffs are the parents of a child born with severe brain damage who died one day after delivery by Caesarian section. The mother (plaintiff) sues on her own behalf and as administratrix of her child’s estate. During a previous pregnancy, the mother was found to be Rh negative, a blood condition which, if not promptly treated, can lead to severe fetal *131damage and death to the child. For this reason, those undertaking the plaintiff’s obstetrical care regularly had blood tests performed so as to allow an appropriate response if the blood condition recurred. These tests were performed at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Little v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Kapp v. BallantineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Lyon v. MorphewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. GibsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bradley v. SugarbakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. McGovern Ex Rel. McGovern v. Brigham & Women's HospitalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  3. Vasa v. Compass Medical, P.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Koltin v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. NannyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API