Legal Opinion

State v. Cessna Aircraft Corporation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1970No. 7010DC554PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the granting of the motion to dismiss the action as to Continental. A careful review of the record impels us to conclude that the assignment is without merit and it is overruled.

Plaintiff’s other assignment of error is to the granting of Cessna’s motion for summary judgment based on its plea of the three years statute of limitations. We agree with the action of the trial court and its conclusion that any claim which plaintiff might have had against Cessna arose on 10 August 1966, the date of the sale of the airplane to Ross and Beam, which date was more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mobley v. Murray CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Hager v. Brewer Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Jarrell v. Samsonite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Williams v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
  5. Thomas William Green v. M. T. D. Products, Inc. And the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API