Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 23, 1941No. 2144PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

Ewell Harris sued Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company to recover compensation for a period of 12 months as the result of a hernia suffered while working for West Texas Cottonoil Company. The Industrial Accident Board ordered an operation for hernia. The insurer tendered the operation and the employee, Harris, refused it. (This is the second appeal of this case, see Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co. v. Harris, Tex.Civ.App., 138 S.W.2d 277.)

Special issue No. 1 and the jury’s answer thereto, were as follows: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence in this case that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wright v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Casualty Underwriters v. RhoneTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Texas Indemnity Insurance v. StaggsTexas Supreme Court · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snodgrass v. RobertsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  2. Travelers Ins. Co. v. CalcoteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  3. Tucker v. SlovacekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. BatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API