Legal Opinion
Plumb v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 22, 1999No. 5:97-cv-60306PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEEH, District Judge.
This action arises out of plaintiffs charges of sexual harassment, disability discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress under state law against her former employer and supervisor. Defendants removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Now before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On January 19, 1999, the court heard oral argument on the motion. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
A. Jurisdiction
Plaintiff originally filed her…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howard Baer, Inc. v. SchaveKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Marquis v. Tecumseh Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Celia Szasz v. Dolgencorp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Howard Baer, Inc. v. SchaveKentucky Supreme Court · 2003