Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

This is a motion by the Attorney General and Railroad Commission of the State of Texas for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Chief Justice and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Texas to bring a judgment of that Court into conformity with the controlling mandate of this Court. The foundation of the motion is the claim that in the proceedings following the remand by this Court to the Texas courts of the litigation in Lone Star Gas Co. v. Texas, 304 U. S. 224, the Supreme Court of Texas has misconceived the scope of our decision. The history of the litigation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lone Star Gas Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. State v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. State v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. DeenTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. LSR Joint Venture No. 2 v. Callewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  3. Trans-State Pavers, Inc. v. Haynes, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
  4. Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. Hall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API