Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Harrington
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
By its fourth and fifth assignments of error, petitioner contends that the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law necessary to decide the issues raised. Specifically, it alleges that the findings of fact set forth by the trial court amount only to a recitation of the evidence. We agree.
G.S. 136-134.1 provides in pertinent part:
Any person who is aggrieved by a final decision of the Secretary of Transportation after exhausting all administrative remedies made available to him ... is entitled to judicial review of such decision ....
The review .…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In re L.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Ellis-Don Construction, Inc. v. HNTB Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.