Legal Opinion
Emmerson v. Weilep
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 1, 2005No. 22385-0-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Based upon his certified petition, Scott Emmerson, a city code enforcement officer, received a temporary antiharassment protection order against Dale Weilep. Mr. Emmerson certified Mr. Weilep engaged in a course of harassing conduct against him related to his position with the code enforcement office. After a hearing, the Spokane County District Court declined to issue a permanent protection order. The court held: (1) Washington’s anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute did not apply, precluding attorney fees under the statute; (2) it had jurisdiction to issue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mahmood v. MahmudNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Gina M. Childs v. Robert A. Ballou Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Kellar v. Estate of KellarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Emmerson v. WeilepCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Nakata v. Blue Bird, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.