Legal Opinion

Emmerson v. Weilep

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2005No. 22385-0-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

110 P.3d 214 (2005)

126 Wash.App. 930

Scott M. EMMERSON, Respondent,

v.

Dale E. WEILEP, Petitioner.

No. 22385-0-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.

March 1, 2005.

Publication Ordered April 12, 2005.

Stephen K. Eugster, Eugster Law Office PSC, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Timothy E. Szambelan, City Attorney's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 Based upon his certified petition, Scott Emmerson, a City code enforcement officer, received a temporary anti-harassment protection order against Dale Weilep. Mr. Emmerson certified Mr. Weilep engaged in a course of harassing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kellar v. Estate of KellarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Nakata v. Blue Bird, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. In Re the Estate of LoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Nakata v. Blue Bird, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API