Legal Opinion
In Re Erbaugh
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 8, 1996No. Bankruptcy 95-33184PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING CREDITOR’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S CLAIM OF EXEMPTION AND DENYING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTOR’S PROPOSED CHAPTER 13 PLAN
WILLIAM A. CLARK, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the motion of Hamilton City Employees Credit Union’s “Objection to Confirmation of Debt- or’s Chapter 13 Plan” (Doc. # 8). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and the standing order of reference entered in this district. This matter is a core pro- ' ceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).
FACTS
On September 15, 1995, Michael Erbaugh (“debtor”) filed a petition in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warren v. Taff (In Re Taff)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
- In Re FlygstadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1986
- In Re HogueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- In Re SchleeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- In Re WebbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re NoskerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- In Re PeacockUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- In Re GuikemaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- In Re RoselleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.