Legal Opinion

In Re Guikema

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 14, 2005No. 04-55750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

This contested matter arises from the objection (“Objection”) filed by Susan L. Rhiel, the Chapter 7 trustee (“Trustee”), to Debra L. Guikema’s claim of an exemp tion in a VALIC retirement annuity (“Annuity”). Under § 2329.66(A)(10)(b) of the Ohio Revised Code, a “person’s right to receive a payment under any pension, annuity ' or similar plan” is exempt to the extent that the payment is “reasonably necessary for the support of the person and the person’s dependents.” Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2329.66(A)(10)(b) (Anderson 2001 & Supp.2003)…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. In Re Charles W. Graham, Debtor. Edward F. Samore, Trustee v. Charles W. Graham, Trustee of the Charles W. Graham, M.D. Ltd. Profit Sharing Plan TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Forbes v. Holiday Corp. Savings & Retirement PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Schafer (In Re Schafer)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. In Re StreetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  3. In re DepascaleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
  4. In re KyleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. In Re AbbottUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API