Legal Opinion
Hudgins v. DeBruyn
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 5, 1996No. IP-93-1075-C-T/G, IP-93-1131-C-T/GPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION’S OF LAW AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
TINDER, District Judge.
These actions came before the court on May 5 and 6, 1995 for trial. The plaintiffs were present in person and by counsel, and the defendants were present by counsel. The evidence was submitted and concluded.
Whereupon the court, having considered the pleadings, the record prior to trial and the evidence, and being duly advised, now makes its findings of fact and conclusions of law, all pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a):
I. Findings of Fact 1
1. Plaintiff Steven Bland (“Bland”) is a prisoner of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Douglas v. DeBruynDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- Mourning v. Correctional Medical ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Jones-Bey v. CohnDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.