Legal Opinion
Jones-Bey v. Cohn
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 8, 2000No. 2:98-cv-00484PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, District Judge.
Nathaniel Jones-Bey filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. .§ 1983, alleging that Indiana Department of Correction (“IDOC”) Commissioner Ed Cohn and Maximum Control Facility (“MCF”) officials Herb Newkirk, Chuck Whalan, Ste phen Huckins and Michael Prevasiee violated his federally protected rights. The court dismissed some of Mr. Jones-Bey’s claims at the screening stage pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, to which Mr. Jones-Bey has responded.
Summary judgment is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- AKARD v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
- AKARD v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024