Legal Opinion
Sherwood v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 3, 1999No. 99-2012PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
743 So.2d 1196 (1999)
Mark SHERWOOD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-2012.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
November 3, 1999.
Mark Sherwood, Lake City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Affirmed. Even if we assume that appellant's motion for postconviction relief is timely as based on newly discovered facts (the use of his prior conviction to enhance a subsequent conviction), it is without merit. Appellant claims that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise appellant that his conviction in this case could be used to…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GinebraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Rhodes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. De AbreuSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. WillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
4Cited by10 opinions
- Major v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Bates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Bismark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Bethune v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.