Legal Opinion
Bismark v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 12, 2001No. 2D01-2672PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
796 So.2d 584 (2001)
Thomas M. BISMARK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-2672.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
September 12, 2001.
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Thomas M. Bismark appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In that motion, he alleged that he was entitled to withdraw his plea pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), because he was not informed of the possible future sentence-enhancing consequences of the conviction. We conclude that the resolution of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Major v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Bethune v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Major v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. HaireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.