Legal Opinion
Nosler v. Quick & Associates
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided December 7, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00267Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MATT NOSLER and DHT ENTERPRISES PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:20-cv-00267-KGB QUICK & ASSOCIATES, JAY HIGGINS, and JEFF QUICK DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by defendants Quick & Associates, Jay Higgins, and Jeff Quick (collectively, “defendants”) (Dkt. No. 7) and the motion to remand filed by plaintiffs Matt Nosler and DHT Enterprises (“DHT”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) (Dkt. No. 14). For the following reasons, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion to remand and grants defendants’…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.