Legal Opinion

United States v. American Precision Products Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 17, 1953No. Civ. A. 422-51PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTSHORNE, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought by the United States of America as plaintiff, by virtue of the provisions of Revised Statutes, Sections 3490 and 5438, now 31 U.S.C.A. § 231, commonly known as the False Claims Act, of which this Court has jurisdiction under Ibid. Sec. 232. So far as pertinent, the False Claims Act-provides:

“Any person * * * who shall make or' cause to be made, or present or cause to be presented, for payment, or approval, * * * any claim upon or against the Government of the United States, or any department or officer thereof, knowing such claim to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Local 167, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. United States v. AccardoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Arctic Ice Cream Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. United States v. KilloughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Herman UeberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  4. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  5. Don Fleming, D/B/A Green Valley Feed Mill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API