Legal Opinion

Krivitskie v. Cramlett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1998No. 2-98-0185PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Plaintiff, Ruth Sonja Krivitskie, filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Brandon W Cramlett. Plaintiff sought to recover for injuries and property damage suffered in an automobile accident in which defendant’s vehicle collided with hers. Count I alleged negligence and count II alleged willful and wanton misconduct. Defendant moved to dismiss count II, pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1996)), arguing that it did not allege sufficient facts to sustain a claim for willful and wanton misconduct. The court granted the motion and made its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant ChurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Heinrich v. Peabody International Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Klatt v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fremont Casualty Insurance v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Sparks v. StarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Ikpoh v. ZollarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Acosta v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Fremont Casualty Insurance Company v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API