Legal Opinion

Fremont Casualty Insurance v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 2000No. 1-00-0342PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

Fremont Casualty Insurance Company, formerly known as Casualty Insurance Company, appeals from the trial court’s determination that it is required to defend its insured, Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corporation (Ace), in an action for negligent spoliation of evidence filed against it by Fred Grossman. Before discussing and analyzing the issues presented, it is necessary to give a brief recitation of the factual and procedural history of the case.

In 1992, Fred Grossman filed an action against Berg Ladders, Inc. (Berg), seeking damages for injuries he allegedly suffered when, during the course of his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Steadfast Insurance v. Caremark RX, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DareAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Wolfram Partnership, Ltd. v. LaSalle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Schusse v. Pace Suburban Bus Division of the Regional Transportation AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Gulino v. Economy Fire and Casualty CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API