Timbrell v. Suburban Hospital, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued the defendant hospital and the defendant McGovern, a nurse, for injuries received by Mrs. Timbrell while she was a patient in the hospital following a Caesarian operation. Hot compresses and hot water bottles were applied to the body of the patient at a time when she was unconscious. Excessively hot applications resulted in serious third degree burns and later required a skin grafting operation. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the nurse and against the hospital. Prom a judgment on the verdict the hospital appeals.
The appellant propounds…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Meyer v. McNutt HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- McBride v. Clara Barton HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by23 opinions
- Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.