Legal Opinion

Timbrell v. Suburban Hospital, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1935No. L. A. 15097PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued the defendant hospital and the defendant McGovern, a nurse, for injuries received by Mrs. Timbrell while she was a patient in the hospital following a Caesarian operation. Hot compresses and hot water bottles were applied to the body of the patient at a time when she was unconscious. Excessively hot applications resulted in serious third degree burns and later required a skin grafting operation. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the nurse and against the hospital. Prom a judgment on the verdict the hospital appeals.

The appellant propounds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Meyer v. McNutt HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McBride v. Clara Barton HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Danville Community Hospital, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API