State v. Wright
Oregon Supreme Court
From Wasco: William L. Bradshaw, Judge. .The defendant, D. Y. .Wright, and another were convicted and fined for peddling without a license, in violation of Laws 1905, p. 339, chap. 206, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
The defendants were arrested for a violation of chapter 206, p. 339, Laws 1905, which provides that any peddler, hawker, or itinerant vendor, who shall peddle, hawk or vend “any stoves, ranges, wagons, carriages, buggies, carts, surreys, or other kinds of four-wheeled or two-wheeled vehicles, or fanning mills or similar goods, wares, or merchandise, within such county,” without first having obtained a license therefor, as provided in section 1 of such act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined not less than $300 or more than $500 or imprisoned in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Armour Packing Co. v. LacySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- State v. ConlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Portland Van & Storage Co. v. HossOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Ex parte BylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.