Legal Opinion

Putnins Contracting Corp. v. Winston Woods at Dix Hills, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We recognize that there are similarities between abandonment and completion of improvements which fall within the ambit of article 3-A of the Lien Law and that one might expect in the careful specification of that article to find explicit provision as to applicable periods of limitations for all situations. Nonetheless we, too, conclude that the one-year Statute of Limitations of subdivision 2 of section 77 is not applicable where there is abandonment rather than completion of the improvement. We note the difference in diction between subdivisions 4 arid 5 -of that section in which provision…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Truax & Hovey, Ltd. v. Grosso (In Re Grosso)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1981
  2. Eminon Acoustical Contractors Corp. v. Richkill Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re Marcus Substructure Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. M. Gold & Son, Inc. v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. In re the General Assignment for Benefit of Creditors of Marcus Substructure Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API