Legal Opinion
Eminon Acoustical Contractors Corp. v. Richkill Associates, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Hyman, J.
This application is made by petitioner, Eminon Acoustical Contractors Corp. (Eminon) for an order pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 76 of the Lien Law directing respondents, Richkill Associates,-Inc., Approved Drywall Corp. and Benro Construction Corp. (Richkill, Approved and Benro, respectively) to serve upon it a verified statement.
Richkill and Benro cross-move to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 1) on the ground of an alleged release, and pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) and subdivision 5 of section 76 of the Lien Law to vacate the request.
The facts, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Onondaga Commercial Dry Wall Corp. v. 150 Clinton Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Constr. Co., Ltd. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Onondaga Commercial Dry Wall Corp. v. Sylvan Glen Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Onondaga Commercial Dry Wall Corp. v. Sylvan Glen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Truax & Hovey, Ltd. v. Grosso (In Re Grosso)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1981
- Burt Building Material Corp. v. Silba (In Re Silba)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Teman Bros. v. New York Plumbers' Specialties Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Primiano Construction Co. v. Ferran Concrete Co.New York Supreme Court · 1982