Legal Opinion
Burgess Bros. v. Stewart
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Actioít for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtCallaghan, J.
The plaintiff, a large exporter of lumber, has brought this action to restrain permanently the defendants from a course of conduct which it is claimed, if persisted in, must inevitably bring financial ruin upon the plaintiff.
The defendants here are steamship companies (operating steamships between the port of New York and various ports of the world) and some of their employees, agents, brokers and stevedores, and the officers and agents of the International Longshoremen’s Union, Local 975, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 807, The Greater New York Lumber Handlers’ Union,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rourke v. Elk Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Kellogg v. . SowerbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- P. Reardon, Inc. v. CatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3Cited by3 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
- Quaker City Motor Parts Co. v. Inter-State Motor Freight SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957