Legal Opinion

Quaker City Motor Parts Co. v. Inter-State Motor Freight System

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1957No. Civ. A. 21825, 21826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a wholesale processor, storer and seller of automobile parts moving to it in interstate commerce, secured a mandatory injunction on December 21, 1956, requiring the two defendant common carriers of goods in interstate commerce to deliver goods consigned to it. The injunction was issued after hearings held on December 19 and December 21, 1956, at which testimony was presented showing, inter alia, that no deliveries had been made to plaintiff since November 27, 1956, in spite of reasonable requests therefor, that plaintiff was losing its customers through…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchandise Warehouse Co. v. A. B. C. Freight Forwarding Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1958
  2. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1961
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API