Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Goldberg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 8, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The main question for determination in this contested acccounting is one of first impression and involves the effect on the will at bar of the amendments to section 35 of the Decedent Estate Law which were made by chapter 459 of the Laws of 1932. This question is raised by the widow’s prayer for a construction of the will, the issue being whether the document, which was executed on June 8, 1930, and admitted to probate on April 29, 1933, was revoked as to the widow by the intermediate intermarriage of the testator with the widow, which occurred on June 18, 1930.

The learned referee…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Trustees of the First Baptist Ch. v. . Brooklyn Fire Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1859

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of DuniganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. Leiserson & Adler, Inc. v. KeamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. In re the Estate of GoldbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of MortensenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. Reff v. KantermanNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API