Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mortensen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 9, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present contested probate affords a welcome variation from the usual routine aspect of such a proceeding. The objections to probate are three in number, and attack the factum of the will, assert that it was secured by fraud and undue influence, and, finally, maintain that if duly and validly executed, it was impliedly revoked by virtue of certain transactions which occurred subsequent to its execution.

The sole contestants are an unrelated legatee under a prior will and the executor named therein. The testimony of a majority of the witnesses produced by the opposing parties…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In re the Estate of WebbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  3. In Re Proving the Will of McGillNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. In re the Estate of SimpsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of SussdorffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. In re the Estate of KrupNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. Cooke v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API