Legal Opinion

Rask v. Town Board of Hendrum

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1928No. 26,545PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The town board of Hendrum in Norman county, under the provisions of G. g. 1923, § 2585, subd. 1, upon the petition of eight legal voters and freeholders of such town, filed February 11, 1927, duly made and filed its order on March 28, 1927, establishing the cartway two rods wide here in controversy. This cartway, if finally established, will extend from the farm of H. J. Rask through the farm of plaintiff to state highway No. 6. It will connect with no other highway. There is now no public highway permitting ingress to and egress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Village of HartlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Mueller v. Supervisors of CourtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Bennett v. BeatySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Rolf v. Town of HancockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lieser v. Town of St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. In Re Appeal of SowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Horton v. Township of HelenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Kroyer v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Powell v. Town Board of Sinnott TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API