Legal Opinion
Rolf v. Town of Hancock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1926No. 25,183PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibedl, J.
Fred H. Rolf appealed to the district court of Carver county from an order of the town board of Hancock vacating and! discontinuing a highway. At the trial the court submitted the following question to the jury:
“Did the town board of the town of Hancock, Carver county, Minnesota, act arbitrarily, oppressively and against the best interests of the public in making the order under date of October 6th, 1921, vacating and discontinuing the public highway mentioned and described in the proceedings herein?”
At the close of the trial the court directed an answer in the negative. Rolf appeals from the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State ex rel. Luley v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Brazil v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Appeal of Beasley Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Burlington Transportation Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Lieser v. Town of St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Packard v. County of Otter TailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.