Legal Opinion

In Re the Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 19, 1995No. MDL 1061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

Currently before the Court is the motion of defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) for a protective order restricting plaintiffs’ attorneys from ex parte contact with present and former Prudential employees. Pursuant to the instructions set forth below, Prudential’s motion will be granted.

BACKGROUND

This ease involves allegations that Prudential engaged in various practices and schemes to defraud customers by misrepresenting the nature and potential cost of certain insurance products. After numerous plaintiffs—as individuals and as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  2. Curley v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  4. Cordy v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  5. State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  3. Apple Corps Ltd. v. International Collectors SocietyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. Michaels v. WoodlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API