Legal Opinion

Matsumoto v. Pua

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1985No. Nos. 85-2728, 85-7568PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Three former Honolulu City Councilmen and their supporters seek emergency relief to allow the councilmen to run in a special election to fill the vacancies created by their recent recall from office. The city clerk maintains that the councilmen are barred from running in the special election by a provision of the city charter that disqualifies recalled city officials from election or appointment to city office for two years after their recall. The district court declined to grant preliminary injunctive relief. On October 28, we entered an order remanding and directing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Conrad Joyner v. Rose Mofford, Secretary of State, State of Arizona Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General, State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Aleknagik Natives Limited v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Half Moon Bay Fishermans' Marketing Ass'n v. CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Emidio Soltysik v. Alex PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Partnoy v. ShelleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2003
  4. Half Moon Bay Fishermans' Marketing Ass'n v. CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Half Moon Bay Fishermen's Marketing Association v. CarlucciCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API