Legal Opinion

Partnoy v. Shelley

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 21, 2003No. 03CV1460 BTM (JFS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION ON THE PLEADINGS AND DECLARING CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS CODE § 11382 UNCONSTITUTIONAL

MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case involves the recall election of California Governor Gray Davis which is currently set for October 7, 2003. By bringing this suit Plaintiffs are not, however, trying to halt or delay the recall election. Rather, Plaintiffs seek to have one discrete provision of the California Elections Code, involving how the votes are to be counted, declared unconstitutional. The challenged provision, section 11382 of the California…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dudum v. ArntzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Black v. HSBC Bank, USA (In re Black)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. In re Interrogatory Propounded by HickenlooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. In re Interrogatory Propounded by HickenlooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API