Legal Opinion

Trowbridge v. O'Neill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 51, Calendar No. 32,510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The defendant is a broker and a member of the Detroit Stock Exchange. His business is buying and selling stocks and bonds. The record discloses that in 1922 the Dort Motor Company was authorized to issue 200,000 shares of no par stock, of which amount 125,000 shares were held in escrow by the Michigan securities commission. Twenty-five thousand of the shares released were underwritten by McClure, Jones & Reid, of New York, and Perry, Seymour & Bonbright, of Flint. These underwriters offered to sell portions of this stock to a selling group, and the defendant subscribed for about 3,000 shares.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GuestNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Segelken v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Commonwealth v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Mayo v. . KnowltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  2. H. Glen Leason v. John D. RosartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Haines v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Broughton v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Alison v. WhitcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API