Legal Opinion

Haines v. Biddle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1936No. Appeal, 345PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

In the middle of October, 1929, plaintiff visited the offices of the defendant brokers, seeking advice on the sale or retention of the securities she then had. As a result of a conference with one of defendants’ salesmen she gave orders to sell certain bonds and to apply the proceeds to the purchase of ninety-four shares of the Class A Common Stock of the Public Utilities Consolidated Corporation. We must assume that the relationship was one of principal and agent. The bonds were sold and the stock purchased, fifty-four shares being furnished by defendants and forty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Everhart v. SearleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  4. Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Rice v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claughton v. Bear Stearns & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Claughton v. Bear Stearns & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Cox v. McCarter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956
  4. Schott v. Senger Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API