Legal Opinion

Booher v. Frue

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1987No. 8728SC37PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their complaint setting forth claims for constructive fraud and constructive trust. We agree.

In order to survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) a plaintiff must only “state enough to give the substantive elements of a legally recognized claim.” Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert and Holland, 79 N.C. App. 81, 85, 339 S.E. 2d 62, 65, disc, rev. granted, 316 N.C. 734, 345 S.E. 2d 392 (1986). To set out a claim for constructive fraud a complaint must allege facts “(1) which created the relation of trust and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Morrow v. Kings Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Speight v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  4. In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. WMC, INC. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API