Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Mothersead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1927No. 17224PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TBEHEE, C.,

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court whereunder the application of H. S. Thomas to be adjudged as a preferred creditor of the Bank of Shattuck, insolvent, in the sum of $564.75 was denied. In the trial court the plaintiff in error was plaintiff and the defendant in error was defendant. As they thus appeared in the trial court, they will hereinafter be referred to.

On July 28, 1924, plaintiff filed a claim with the defendant as liquidating agent for the Bank of Shattuck in the amount of $564.-75, whereunder he requested that he be determined and adjijdged by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kansas Flour Mills Co. v. New State Bank of WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Kesl v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Bank of Commerce v. IngramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Bristow v. O'BannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Shull v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Elkins v. LallierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API