Legal Opinion

Kohinoor Coal Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 1948No. 9630PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from the -decision of the Tax Cour-t.

*881The question presented is whether the taxpayer i-s entitled to an allowance for percentage depletion with respect to its operations in the extraction and processing of coal from oulm or refuse ¡banks which it leased for that purpose from the owner and operator of a coal mine. The claim for depletion allowance is based upon Section 23(m)1; Section 114(b) (4) (A) and (B) as amended,2 of the Internal Revenue Code; and Section 29.23(m)-,l of Treasury Regulations 111.3

The facts, which are not in dispute, may be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Helvering v. Bankline Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Clyde Guthrie and Edith D. Guthrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. Holbrook v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Hoban v. VileyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1951
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Claude C. Wood CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API