Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Bankline Oil Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1938No. Nos. 387, 388PublishedCited by 189 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

No. 887.—This case presents the question whether respondent, the Bankline Oil Company, is entitled to an allowance for depletion with respect to gas produced from certain oil and gas wells. The ruling of the Board of Tax Appeals that the taxpayer had no depletable interest (33 B. T. A. 910) was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 90 F. (2d) 899. Because of an asserted conflict with the principles applicable under the decisions of this Court, we granted certiorari.

Respondent in the years 1927 to 1930 operated a casing-head gasoline plant in the Signal Hill Oil Field, Los Angeles County,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by189 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Parsons v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Paragon Jewel Coal Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API