Legal Opinion

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided January 20, 2017No. CASE NO. 2:12-CV-691 (Three-Judge Court), CASE NO. 2:12-CV-1081 (Three-Judge Court)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

The Alabama Legislature faced a difficult task in 2012. The Fourteenth Amendment requires state legislative districts of roughly equal population and prohibits racial gerrymandering. But the Voting Rights Act required Alabama to avoid retrogressing the ability of black voters to elect candidates of their choice. In other words, the legislature had to draw districts of roughly equal population that were conscious enough of race to comply with the Voting Rights Act, but not so conscious of race that they violated the Fourteenth Amendment.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Secretary of State for the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Greater Birmingham Ministries v. MerrillDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
  3. Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Secretary of State for the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API