Legal Opinion

South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. Alabama

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 1999No. 97-2045PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

The basic question in this ease is whether tax Alabama assesses on foreign corporations violates the Commerce Clause. We conclude that it does.

I

Alabama requires each corporation doing State to pay a franchise tax based upon the firm's capital. A domestic firm, organized under the laws of Alabama, must pay tax in an amount equal to 1% of the par value of the firm’s stock. Ala. Const., Art. XII, §229; Ala. Code §40-14-40 (1993); App. to Pet. for Cert. 50a, 52a, 61a (Stipulated Facts). A foreign firm, organized under the laws of a State other than Alabama, must pay tax in an amount equal to 0.3%…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  5. Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API