Legal Opinion
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Clark
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error from the Probate Court of Oklahoma County; before Wm. P. Harper, Trial Judge
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Gillette, J.:
This action was commenced in the probate court of Oklahoma county in September, 1904, by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error for the recovery of the sum of $150.30.
Summons was issued on the 7th day of September, 1904, and was returned by the sheriff with the following endorsement of service thereon:
“Territory of Oklahoma,
“Oklahoma County, ss.
“I hereby certify that on the 7th day of September, 1904, I personally served the within summons on the within named defendants by delivering'to each of them personally a true copy of the same, with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wilmington & Weldon Railroad v. AlsbrookSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kinkade v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spaulding v. PolleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Commonwealth Cotton Oil Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wm. Cameron & Co. v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.