Beaney v. United States
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Charles H. Beaney, d/b/a Beaney Transport, seeks to enjoin two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, and pursuant to the cumbersome procedure1 for reviewing Commission orders, a statutory three-judge court has been invoked.2 Plaintiff’s arguments in support of his request for interlocutory and permanent injunctions are completely without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the Commission orders under attack and deny the injunctions sought.
Plaintiff Beaney, a motor common carrier with his principal place of business in upstate New York, operates a fleet of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
- Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Homer White, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1968