Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Opsahl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 30, 1989No. C7-89-654PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Following the death of Esther Opsahl, a will executed on November 3, 1987 was filed for probate. An objection was served and filed by Marjorie Brummond. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded that the will was the product of undue influence and was void.
The trial court’s order refusing to admit the November 3 will to probate was filed on December 20, 1988. The will proponents then moved for a new trial, amended findings of fact and conclusions of law, and an order approving attorney fees. This motion was denied in its entirety by order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rieman v. JoubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Levine v. HauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Matter of Estate of TrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Matsch v. Prairie Island Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997