Legal Opinion

Union National Bank v. Choppin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1894No. 11,436PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. James. Guión, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, C. J.

The plaintiff corporation in 1880, as owner of an undivided portion of the Home plantation, in the parish of St. James, brought this suit against the three original defendants, Dr. Pierre F. Choppin, Louis H. Choppin and Joseph E. Choppin, then the owners of the other undivided portions of said plantation, for the purpose of obtaining a judicial partition of the property. The three defendants were cited, and in due course P. F. and L. H. Choppin filed their answer. J. E. Choppin not answering, a judgment by default was entered against…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kendrick's Heirs v. KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Guidry v. Guidry HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  3. McKerall v. McMillanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  4. Penalta v. Borges'Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  5. Cheevers v. Burke's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Erskine v. GardinerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Knox v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Cusachs v. DugueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Succession of TertrouSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API