Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Riehle

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1914No. 3975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Denver District Coitrt. Hon. James H. Teller, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The lower court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff brings error. The complaint was for the specific performance of a written contract for the exchange of real property owned by each of the parties, respectively. The answer admits the contract, pleads it in ha'cc verba-, and alleges, that it is wholly without any valuable consideration, wholly without mutuality, and void, together with other defenses not now involved.

The consideration Consisted in the respective promises and agreement to Convey, by each party, upon -conveyance by the other. -Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frue v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  2. Wood v. CasserleighSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. Welch v. WhelpleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wilks v. Georgia Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Gordon v. DarnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Levand v. North America Realty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API