Legal Opinion

McKeown v. Southern California Freight Forwarders

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 29, 1943No. 1885 O’C CivilPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation pursuant to sec, 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b). The principal work of the plaintiff was that of a checker employed by the defendant. Goods which were unloaded on the platform were checked by the plaintiff and at times, but infrequently, he assisted in placing the goods in a truck which transported them to their destination, or in a bin. McKeown v. Southern California Freight Forwarders, D.C., 49 F.Supp. 543.

The defendant denies any liability to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. FainblattSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Muldowney v. Seaberg Elevator Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Mexico Public Service Co. v. EngelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Bohn v. B & B Ice & Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1946
  3. Mitchell v. Telephone Answering Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1959
  4. Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API