United States v. James A. Merriam, United States of America v. Harold B. Hayes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANNER, District Judge:
James A. Merriam and Harold B. Hayes appeal the denial of their motion to dismiss an indictment charging them with conspiracy to commit and commission of wire fraud and securities fraud. They claim that lifetime bar orders previously issued against them by the SEC equated to punishment and thus precluded their subsequent indictment under the Double Jeopardy Clause. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule. United States v. Chick, 61 F.3d 682, 686 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Ronald D. ChickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael GARTNER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kenneth Craig Krull v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nanita SCHILLER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Brownson v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003