Legal Opinion
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. State
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 30, 1995No. 95-191-AppealPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOURCIER, Justice.
This matter comes before us by submission of a certified question from the Honorable Ernest C. Torres, a judge of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The request is made pursuant to Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure.
There is litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island that arises out of the execution of a tribal-state compact as contemplated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d), and which permits the establishment of Class III gaming on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- In Re Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Mikaelian v. Drug Abuse UnitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Chang v. University of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
3Cited by29 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- McCartney v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.