Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Petitioner, who was convicted in 1985 of aggravated murder and other crimes, seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision that set his matrix range at 228 to 288 months and established a projected parole release date of June 28, 2013. He contends that the board erred in holding a “second prison term hearing” and in imposing “a different matrix range and prison term than it did after the first prison term hearing based on the same information.” He further contends that the use of a three-member board to decide those issues violated the ex post facto…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Wille v. Board of Parole & Post-Prision SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017