In Re Clark

Today, we find that respondent's repeated failures, in two separate cases, to respond in a timely manner to lawful demands for information from the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 8.1(b) and warrant respondent's suspension from the practice of law for ninety (90) days.

These proceedings commenced with the Commission's filing of a two count verified complaint against respondent on September 23, 2008. Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(b), we appointed a hearing officer to hear this matter on October 31, 2008, and…